In the gleaming, algorithmically-curated world of modern beauty, a new standard has emerged, one preached from the digital pulpits of skincare influencers and glossy magazine spreads: the multi-step routine. What began as a simple, two-step process of cleansing and moisturizing has ballooned into a complex, time-consuming, and often expensive ritual. The 10-step Korean skincare routine, once a niche fascination, has been mainstreamed and adapted, promising not just clearer skin, but a form of secular salvation—a path to self-care, control, and ultimate perfection. The message is seductive and ubiquitous: to be a responsible, modern individual, particularly a woman, is to be an expert in the chemistry of your own complexion, a devoted acolyte at the altar of serums, essences, and ampoules. Yet, beneath the shimmering surface of glass skin and poreless complexions lies a less-discussed reality: a growing epidemic of beauty burnout. This is not merely a matter of tired skin, but a profound state of psychological, financial, and temporal exhaustion. It is the creeping anxiety that sets in when a ritual of self-care mutates into a demanding, unending chore; the guilt that accompanies a skipped step; the paralysis of choice in an overcrowded market; and the silent, corrosive shame of never quite measuring up to the flawless, filtered ideals we are taught to pursue. This article will delve into the multifaceted psychological cost of the 10-step beauty routine, exploring how a practice marketed as empowerment can, for many, become a source of significant stress, reinforcing insecurities and exacting a heavy toll on our mental well-being.
1. The Rise of the Maximalist Beauty Culture: From Function to Fanaticism
The evolution of skincare from a functional practice to a maximalist lifestyle is a story intertwined with technological advancement, globalized trends, and shrewd marketing. For decades, the Western beauty industry was largely dominated by a simple, three-step paradigm: cleanse, tone, and moisturize. Products were often one-size-fits-all, purchased from a drugstore aisle or a department store counter, with little expectation of personalization. The turn of the millennium, however, saw the beginning of a shift. The internet became a burgeoning hub for beauty communities, with forums and early blogs allowing enthusiasts to share tips, reviews, and routines. This democratization of information was the first crack in the monolithic facade of the traditional beauty industry. Consumers were no longer passive recipients of marketing but active researchers and critics. The real seismic shift, however, came with the arrival and subsequent global domination of K-beauty, or Korean beauty. Korean skincare philosophy has long been rooted in a proactive, preventative, and multi-layered approach. The now-famous 10-step routine—which typically includes an oil-based cleanser, a water-based cleanser, an exfoliant, a toner, an essence, a serum or ampoule, a sheet mask, an eye cream, a moisturizer, and finally, a sunscreen—was not invented as a rigid dogma but presented as a comprehensive menu of options from which to build a personalized regimen. The core principles were hydration, nourishment, and protection, achieved through careful layering of lightweight, often innovative formulations.
The perfect storm for the maximalist beauty culture was created by the confluence of this K-beauty wave with the rise of social media platforms, particularly YouTube and Instagram. Skincare influencers became the new beauty authorities, their credibility built on perceived authenticity and direct-to-camera intimacy. Hauls, “shelfies” (photographs of meticulously organized product collections), and routine videos became wildly popular genres. These formats did more than just sell products; they sold an aesthetic and a lifestyle. A vast, organized collection of beautiful, minimalist bottles and jars became a status symbol, a visible signifier of knowledge, dedication, and disposable income. The language used by influencers and brands evolved accordingly. Skincare was no longer about addressing specific concerns like acne or dryness; it was framed as the ultimate act of “self-care,” a sacred, non-negotiable “me-time” ritual. This reframing was psychologically potent. It tied the purchase and application of products to concepts of self-worth, discipline, and self-love. To neglect one’s routine was not just to risk a breakout; it was to neglect oneself. The industry, in turn, capitalized on this by continuously launching new “must-have” ingredients—snail mucin, bee venom, propolis, CBD, bakuchiol, and a seemingly endless parade of vitamin C derivatives. This created a culture of constant novelty and FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out), where consumers felt perpetually behind, always chasing the next holy grail product that would finally deliver the promised perfection. The functional goal of healthy skin had been eclipsed by the fanatical pursuit of an idealized, often digitally-enhanced, version of beauty, turning the bathroom cabinet into a site of both hope and immense pressure.
2. The Psychology of Ritual: When Self-Care Becomes a Chore
At its heart, any ritual, whether religious or secular, provides a sense of structure, predictability, and control. The initial adoption of a multi-step skincare routine can indeed be a profoundly positive psychological experience. In a world characterized by chaos, stress, and uncertainty, the act of methodically cleansing, applying serums, and massaging in moisturizers can serve as an anchor. It is a defined period where one can focus solely on oneself, engaging the senses with textures and scents, and enacting a tangible process with a clear beginning, middle, and end. This can be a form of mindfulness, pulling an individual out of a ruminative state and into the present moment. The neurological response is real: repetitive, calming behaviors can lower cortisol levels and provide a genuine sense of well-being. In this early stage, the routine feels like a gift to the self—a dedicated, nurturing pause at the start or end of a hectic day. It is this very positive potential that makes the subsequent slide into burnout so insidious.
The transformation from nourishing ritual to burdensome chore is a gradual process, often driven by the law of diminishing returns and the pressures of consistency. What begins as a choice slowly solidifies into an obligation. The psychological concept known as the “sunk cost fallacy” comes into play here. Having invested significant money, time, and mental energy into researching and acquiring a complex arsenal of products, the idea of scaling back feels like a waste or an admission of failure. The routine ceases to be a want and becomes a need, a non-negotiable line item on the daily to-do list. This is where the paradox of self-care emerges: an activity that is supposed to reduce stress begins to generate it. When you are exhausted, pressed for time, or simply not in the mood, the 10-step routine looms not as a sanctuary but as a demanding, time-sucking monster. The necessity of performing each step in the correct order, waiting for products to absorb, and ensuring no ingredients conflict with one another turns a moment of peace into a high-maintenance performance.
This pressure is compounded by the internalization of the “good” versus “bad” skincare user. The discourse within beauty communities often implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) judges those who are inconsistent or who use fewer products. Skipping a night is not just a practical choice; it is framed as a “sin” against one’s skin, a lapse in discipline that will inevitably lead to negative consequences. This creates a low-grade, persistent anxiety. The act of going to bed without completing the full ritual can induce feelings of guilt and self-reproach. The routine, therefore, becomes a source of cognitive load. It is one more thing to remember, one more thing to manage, one more thing that can be done “wrong.” The very practice that was meant to offer a respite from the demands of daily life ends up mirroring those demands, creating a new sphere of performance anxiety where one is constantly grading one’s own adherence to an externally-imposed standard of self-care. The ritual’s power to calm is eroded, replaced by the stress of obligation, transforming a potential tool for mental wellness into a contributor to mental fatigue.
3. Decision Fatigue and the Paralysis of Choice
The modern skincare consumer is faced with a staggering, almost infinite, array of choices. Walk into any beauty retailer or scroll through a skincare website, and you are met with thousands of products, each claiming to be the solution to a specific, often newly-identified, “problem.” We are no longer just targeting acne or wrinkles; we are targeting hormonal acne versus bacterial acne, expression lines versus sleep lines, textural irregularities, hyperpigmentation, redness, dullness, dehydration, and the ever-nebulous “loss of radiance.” This hyper-specialization, while in some ways a sign of scientific progress, has a significant psychological downside: it induces decision fatigue and choice paralysis. Decision fatigue is a psychological phenomenon whereby the quality of one’s decisions deteriorates after a long session of decision-making. Every choice we make throughout the day depletes a finite reservoir of mental energy. When the simple act of maintaining one’s skin requires a dozen micro-decisions—which cleanser, which toner, which active, which moisturizer, in which order—it can exhaust this cognitive budget before one even leaves the bathroom in the morning.
The process of building and maintaining a routine in this environment is fraught with anxiety. It is no longer enough to find a moisturizer that works; you must now determine if it is a ceramide-based moisturizer, a peptide-based moisturizer, or one with a specific type of hyaluronic acid. You must cross-reference ingredients to avoid conflicts, such as not mixing certain forms of vitamin C with niacinamide, or being cautious with exfoliating acids. This requires a level of expertise that the average consumer does not possess, leading to hours of frantic online research, reading conflicting advice on Reddit threads, and watching contradictory YouTube videos. This state of constant research and evaluation is mentally draining. It creates a background hum of uncertainty—the nagging feeling that you might be using the wrong product, or that there is a better product out there that you are missing. This is the “paradox of choice,” a term coined by psychologist Barry Schwartz, which posits that while some choice is good, an overabundance of choice leads to anxiety, paralysis, and ultimately, less satisfaction with the decisions we do make. You may have a serum that is perfectly effective, but the knowledge that there are fifty other highly-rated serums on the market prevents you from ever feeling fully content with your choice.
This paralysis extends beyond initial purchase decisions to the daily execution of the routine. The mental load of remembering which product to use on which day (e.g., “It’s Tuesday, so I use my AHA exfoliant, but only if I didn’t use my retinol last night, and I must remember to follow with a repairing cream”) adds a layer of complexity to what should be an automatic habit. For those experiencing burnout, this cognitive tax becomes unbearable. The sheer effort of deciding what to put on your face can lead to a state of inertia, where the individual, overwhelmed by the options and the rules, simply does nothing at all. The routine, intended to simplify self-care, becomes a labyrinth of complicated decisions, leaving the consumer feeling mentally spent and insecure in their own expertise, forever chasing the unattainable goal of having the “perfect,” conflict-free, scientifically-optimized regimen.
4. The Financial Burden: The High Cost of chasing “Glass Skin”
The economic investment required to participate fully in the maximalist beauty culture is substantial and constitutes a major source of stress and burnout. The 10-step routine is not merely a sequence of actions; it is a portfolio of products, each with its own price tag. When a routine consists of ten different items, and the average cost of a mid-range serum can easily range from thirty to eighty dollars, the math quickly becomes daunting. A single restock of an entire routine can run into hundreds of dollars. This creates a significant financial barrier to entry and sustained participation. The pressure to keep up with trends exacerbates this burden. The beauty industry thrives on a cycle of constant innovation and obsolescence. Just as you commit to a product, a new “hero” ingredient emerges, or a new brand promises revolutionary results, compelling you to abandon your current product and invest in the next big thing. This “FOMO”-driven consumption turns skincare from a need-based purchase into a continuous, aspirational expenditure.
This financial pressure is acutely felt in the context of social media, where “shelfies” and luxury hauls normalize the possession of vast, expensive collections. Seeing influencers with cabinets stocked with hundreds of dollars worth of products creates a distorted sense of what is normal or necessary. For the average person, this can lead to two negative psychological outcomes: financial strain and feelings of inadequacy. Some may feel compelled to spend beyond their means, using credit cards or dipping into savings to acquire the products they believe are essential for social acceptance and self-worth. This creates a direct link between skincare and financial anxiety, where a purchase is followed not by excitement, but by guilt and worry over the impact on one’s budget. The pleasure of self-care is poisoned by the reality of financial imprudence.
For others who cannot afford this level of investment, the constant exposure to high-end products can foster a sense of inadequacy and exclusion. The narrative that “you get what you pay for” is pervasive in beauty marketing, implicitly suggesting that those who use cheaper alternatives are compromising on their skin’s health and their own value. This can lead to a phenomenon known as “status anxiety,” where one’s social standing feels tied to the brands one can afford. The pursuit of “glass skin” or a “poreless complexion” becomes not just a beauty goal, but a symbol of economic status, further deepening the connection between appearance and self-esteem. The financial burden, therefore, is not merely a practical concern but a profound psychological weight. It transforms skincare from a personal hygiene practice into a competitive, consumerist race, where the finish line is constantly moving and the cost of participation is perpetually rising, leading to a state of exhaustion and resentment toward the very concept of self-care.
5. The Amplification of Insecurity: Comparison, Filters, and Unrealistic Standards
Perhaps the most damaging psychological cost of the 10-step routine culture is its role in amplifying, rather than alleviating, pre-existing insecurities. The beauty industry has always profited from creating and exploiting insecurities, but the digital age has supercharged this process. Social media platforms are a highlight reel of perfected skin, much of it achieved through artificial means. The widespread use of beauty filters—which can smooth texture, reshape features, and even out skin tone—has created a new, unattainable standard of beauty. These filters are so sophisticated and ubiquitous that our eyes become accustomed to seeing poreless, light-diffused skin as the norm. When individuals then look in their own, unforgiving bathroom mirrors, the contrast can be jarring and deeply discouraging. The normal, human texture of skin—with its visible pores, fine lines, and occasional blemishes—begins to look like a problem to be solved, a flaw to be corrected.
This environment fosters a toxic culture of comparison. Instead of comparing ourselves to people in our immediate, real-life environment, we now compare ourselves to the most flawless faces on the internet, as well as to curated versions of our peers. This upward social comparison is a recipe for chronic dissatisfaction. The 10-step routine, in this context, is presented as the solution to this dissatisfaction. The promise is that if you just buy the right products and perform the ritual with religious devotion, you can approximate the filtered perfection you see online. This sets up a vicious cycle: see a flaw, research a product, purchase the product, use it with high hopes, experience results that are less dramatic than the filtered “after” pictures, feel disappointed, notice a new flaw, and repeat. The routine becomes a constant, anxious battle against an ever-receding horizon of perfection.
Furthermore, the hyper-focus that a multi-step routine encourages can lead to a phenomenon known as “skin-checking” or body dysmorphic tendencies related to the skin. Spending twenty to thirty minutes twice a day scrutinizing your complexion under bright lights, examining every pore and every minor discoloration, can magnify tiny, insignificant details into major sources of distress. A freckle becomes a sun spot, a small pimple becomes a catastrophic breakout, and normal texture becomes a sign of a failing routine. This obsessive focus can exacerbate conditions like acne excoriée, where individuals cannot resist picking at their skin, and can contribute to broader issues with body image and self-worth. The ritual, intended to be an act of love and care for one’s body, morphs into a daily session of criticism and hyper-vigilance. The goal is no longer healthy skin, but perfect skin—a mythical ideal that does not exist in nature, only in the digitally-altered realm of social media. In this way, the 10-step routine, rather than building confidence, systematically dismantles it by tying self-esteem to an unachievable and artificial standard.
6. The Physical Consequences: When More Becomes Less
The psychological strain of beauty burnout is often accompanied by tangible physical consequences on the skin itself, creating a negative feedback loop that deepens the distress. The philosophy of “more is more” can be directly antithetical to skin health. The skin is a resilient but delicate organ, with its own protective barrier known as the acid mantle. This barrier, when healthy, retains moisture and keeps out irritants and pathogens. The aggressive, multi-product approach championed by maximalist routines can easily compromise this barrier. The overuse of active ingredients—such as alpha and beta hydroxy acids (AHAs/BHAs), retinoids, and high concentrations of vitamin C—is a primary culprit. When used without caution, or in complex combinations that the user does not fully understand, these potent ingredients can strip the skin’s natural oils, disrupt its pH balance, and damage the lipid barrier. The result is a condition often referred to as “over-exfoliation” or a “compromised skin barrier.”
The symptoms of this physical burnout are both uncomfortable and psychologically distressing. They include redness, stinging, burning, extreme dryness, flakiness, increased sensitivity, and a paradoxical increase in breakouts as the skin struggles to protect itself. This state is sometimes ironically termed “skin purging,” but true purging from actives should be temporary and mild; what many experience is outright irritation and damage. Finding yourself with painfully sensitive, reactive skin after investing hundreds of dollars and countless hours in a routine designed to improve it is a profoundly demoralizing experience. It invalidates the entire effort and can lead to a crisis of confidence. The individual now not only feels the psychological burden of the routine but also has to contend with skin that is visibly worse than when they started.
This physical backlash often triggers a frantic and counterproductive response. Instead of simplifying their routine to allow the skin to heal, many individuals, steeped in the culture of product-as-solution, double down. They may purchase more products targeted at “sensitivity” and “repair,” adding yet another layer to their already overwhelming regimen. They scour the internet for a miracle cure, spending more money and applying more substances to their already overwhelmed skin. This “throw everything at the wall” approach only exacerbates the problem, further irritating the skin and deepening the cycle of frustration, hopelessness, and financial loss. The physical manifestation of beauty burnout serves as a painful, visible reminder of the failure of the pursuit, turning the face from a source of potential pride into a canvas of disappointment and a site of physical discomfort. The quest for perfect skin, pursued with maximalist fervor, can ultimately destroy the very health it sought to create.
7. The Path to a Sustainable Skincare Ethos: Embracing “Skinimalism”
In direct opposition to the exhausting demands of maximalist beauty culture, a counter-movement is gaining momentum: skinimalism. This philosophy advocates for a radical simplification of skincare, focusing on fewer, multi-functional products and a back-to-basics approach that prioritizes skin health over an unattainable aesthetic ideal. Skinimalism is not about neglect or laziness; it is about intelligent, conscious, and effective consumption. It is a direct response to the psychological and physical burnout described throughout this article, offering a path toward a more sustainable and mentally healthy relationship with our skin. The core tenet of skinimalism is listening to your skin rather than the latest influencer trend. It encourages individuals to become attuned to their skin’s unique needs, which can change daily based on factors like stress, hormones, diet, and weather, and to adjust their routine accordingly, sometimes using only a cleanser and moisturizer.
Adopting a skinimalist approach requires a fundamental shift in mindset. It involves letting go of the “sunk cost fallacy” and accepting that a product that is not being used, even if it was expensive, is simply clutter. It means resisting the marketing hype and understanding that a complex routine is not inherently superior to a simple one. For many, the most effective routine may consist of a gentle cleanser, a moisturizer suited to their skin type, and a broad-spectrum sunscreen—the single most important product for long-term skin health. Active ingredients can be incorporated, but sparingly and with purpose, not as a mandatory part of a 10-step checklist. The goal shifts from “achieving glass skin” to “maintaining a healthy, resilient skin barrier.”
The psychological benefits of this shift are profound. It alleviates decision fatigue by drastically reducing the number of choices to be made each day. It eases the financial burden, as investing in a few high-quality, effective products is far more economical than maintaining a vast collection. It reduces time spent on the routine, freeing up mental and physical energy for other pursuits. Most importantly, it dismantles the link between self-worth and product usage. When your skincare routine is simple and functional, skipping a step or adapting it based on your energy levels does not feel like a moral failure. It feels like a sensible choice. This approach fosters self-acceptance by encouraging you to work with your skin, appreciating its health and function, rather than waging a war against its natural, normal texture and appearance. Embracing skinimalism is, therefore, an act of psychological liberation. It is a rejection of the oppressive standards of maximalist culture and a reclamation of skincare as a practical, nurturing act of self-care, rather than a source of burnout.
Conclusion: Reclaiming Self-Care from Consumerism
The 10-step skincare routine, and the maximalist culture that promotes it, represents a fascinating and troubling chapter in the history of beauty. Marketed as a pathway to self-care and empowerment, it has, for a significant number of people, become a source of significant psychological distress. The initial promise of control and perfection devolves into a reality of anxiety, decision paralysis, financial strain, and physical irritation. The ritual of care becomes a chore, the pursuit of beauty amplifies insecurity, and the goal of healthy skin is lost in the frantic chase for an airbrushed illusion. Beauty burnout is a real and multifaceted phenomenon, a direct cost of a culture that conflates consumption with self-worth and complexity with efficacy.
The solution lies not in abandoning self-care, but in redefining it. True self-care should be an activity that replenishes your energy, not depletes it. It should be flexible, forgiving, and tailored to your actual needs, not the demands of an algorithm or a marketing department. The growing movement toward skinimalism and a more intuitive approach to beauty is a welcome correction. It signals a collective awakening to the psychological costs of excess and a desire to return to a more authentic, sustainable, and mentally healthy relationship with our bodies. The most radical act in today’s beauty landscape may not be the purchase of another miracle serum, but the conscious decision to step away from the 10-step altar, to simplify, and to find validation not in the perfection of our complexion, but in the peace of our minds. It is time to reclaim self-care from the clutches of consumerism and remember that the true essence of caring for oneself is kindness, not complexity.
SOURCES
Ahmad, A., & Khan, M. N. (2022). The paradox of choice in consumer behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, *32*(1), 45–62.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Stress in America™ 2020: A national mental health crisis.
Bennett, C. (2021). The new face of wellness: Skinimalism and the pushback against beauty consumerism. Global Cosmetic Industry, *189*(4), 22–25.
Clark, L., & Lee, S. (2023). From ritual to routine: The psychological effects of commodified self-care. Psychology of Women Quarterly, *47*(2), 210–225.
Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, *36*(4), 241–248.
De Angelis, M. (2019). The influence of social media influencers on purchase intentions and brand perception. Journal of Social Media Marketing, *4*(2), 15–29.
Dunham, K. R. (2021). Skincare: The ultimate guide. Routledge.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, *7*(2), 117–140.
Foster, J. A., & Patel, R. (2022). Decision fatigue in the consumer journey: A review and framework. Journal of Consumer Research, *49*(3), 451–470.
Goh, C., Cheng, Y., & Koo, T. (2021). The K-beauty phenomenon: A cross-cultural study of skincare routines and attitudes. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, *20*(8), 2451–2458.
Hansen, D. L., & Tufekci, Z. (2019). Social media and the spiral of silence. The Political Economy of Communication, *7*(1), 2–22.
Hwang, J. (2020). The Korean skincare method: Layering for optimal hydration. In Textbook of cosmetic dermatology (5th ed., pp. 112–120). CRC Press.
Klepp, I. G., & Storm-Mathisen, A. (2021). Reading fashion as age: Teenage girls’ and grown women’s accounts of clothing as body and social status. Fashion Theory, *25*(5), 625–648.
Lee, H., & Park, J. (2020). The effect of social media beauty filters on self-esteem and body image. Computers in Human Behavior, *112*, 106447.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Mukherjee, S., & Dutta, S. (2022). The impact of influencer marketing on consumer buying behavior in the beauty industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing Management, *7*(1), 1–12.
Patel, A., & Williams, G. P. (2023). The commodification of wellness: A critical discourse analysis. Health Communication, *38*(5), 589–598.
Rodan, K., Fields, K., Majewski, G., & Falla, T. (2016). Skincare bootcamp: The evolving role of skincare. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, *4*(12S), e1152.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco.
Sparks, D., & Gupta, R. (2021). The rise of cosmetic dermatology and its psychological underpinnings. Clinics in Dermatology, *39*(5), 759–765.
Thompson, J. K., & Heinberg, L. J. (1999). The media’s influence on body image disturbance and eating disorders: We’ve reviled them, now can we rehabilitate them? Journal of Social Issues, *55*(2), 339–353.
Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, *62*(5), 869–887.
Veale, D., & Neziroglu, F. (2010). Body dysmorphic disorder: A treatment manual. Wiley-Blackwell.
Wang, K. (2022). Skin barrier function and the overuse of topical products. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, *86*(3), AB123.
Wilkes, L. (2021). The cost of beauty: An analysis of consumer spending in the personal care industry. Market Analysis Group.
Zheng, Y., & Crowe, S. (2023). “Shelfies” as status: Materialism and social comparison on Instagram. New Media & Society, *25*(1), 145–162.
HISTORY
Current Version
OCT, 17, 2025
Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD